Prohens denounces “imminent approval of the amnesty law” that “will be done with the defense and complicity of Armengol”

The president of the PP of the Balearic Islands, Marga Prohens, denounced this Sunday, on the occasion of the event organized by the party in the Plaza de España in Madrid, the “imminent approval of the amnesty law” that “will be done with the defense and complicity of Armengol”. In statements to the media, Prohens explained that a delegation from the Balearic PP has traveled to Madrid to “claim, in the face of this imminent approval of the amnesty law, that this is nothing other than the surrender of the PSOE and the rule of law.” , of 40 years of constitutional consensus, which is the best gift that parents and grandparents left us through the Transition.” “It is the attack on judges and prosecutors. An unprecedented attack on a democratic state and the rule of law,” added the also president of the Government. Furthermore, the ‘popular’ of the Islands have mobilized because “after this disastrous amnesty law, there will be first-class and second-class Spaniards.” And, that this “will be done with the defense and complicity of the Socialist Party of the Balearic Islands, of Francina Armengol.” The ‘popular’ leader, who has led the delegation of members of the PP in the islands who have participated in Madrid in the ‘A Strong Spain’ rally in defense of equality between all Spaniards and against the amnesty, has criticized in this sense that “Armengol has publicly defended the amnesty, an amnesty that before the elections he rejected and called unconstitutional but that he now defends for the convenience of Sánchez.” Prohens has thus regretted “that Armengol has become the main defender of the amnesty, compared to other socialist presidents who criticize the surrender to pro-independence parties and the inclusion of terrorism crimes in the law.” Given this, he concluded, “from the PP we are going to resort to all possible fronts: to the institutions, to the courts and also to the streets, with the people, to express our disagreement with this law that attacks the separation of powers. , against the rule of law and against our Constitution”.